RADHAKRISHNA MENON
JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
EXCISE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
1. he first plaintiff in O.S.274/88 is the revision petitioner. The suit is one for permanent injunction. He filed I.A. 1228/88 for temporary injunction restraining defendants 1 to 4 from conducting a bar in Sea Blue Hotel in Manni) buildings described in the schedule attached to the plaint, and 5th defendant from issuing licence for the conduct of such a bar. The trial court allowed the application after bearing the objections of defendants 1 to 5. The fourth defendant challenged the order by filing C.M.A. 25/88 before the District Court, Pathanamthitta. The firth defendant who is the sixth respondent herein, the Excise Commissioner challenged the order by filing C.M.A. 37/88. Both these appeals were heard and disposed of by the order under challenge.
2. Facts relevant and requisite to decide the issue lie in a narrow compass. Defendants 1 to 4 have recently taken on rent the first and second floors of Mannil Buildings for the conduct of a bar attached Hotel by name 'Sea Blue Hotel'. The St. Mary's L.P. School is a Government recognised school. The bar attached hotel proposed to be opened is located within the prohibited range namely, within 200 metres from the above me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.