SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 422

RADHAKRISHNA MENON
RETNAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
VENGANOOR PANCHAYAT – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. he plaintiff in a suit for settlement of accounts is the revision petitioner.

2. is application, I. A..3854/87 under Order VI R.17 C. P. C. seeking the following amendments, has been dismissed by the order under challenge:-"Title.

The word "Accounts" to be amended as "damages". 2. Relief:

(A) "A decree allowing the plaintiff to realise the sum of money as found by the court due to the plaintiff from defendant by settling the accounts towards agreement No.29/ 81-82 for the work of seven point programme-construction of burial ground in Kottukulam in Venganoor Panchayat, including all items of works executed, materials supplied for the purpose of work, interest and compensation for damages and refund of security deposit from defendant's assets both movable and immovable is to be amended as:

"A decree allowing the plaintiff to realise Rs. 72,130.77 as per the statement of accounts given below from defendant's assets both movable and immovable".

3. Prayer B.

From the 2nd line portion from "for the money due to the plaintiff from defendant as per Prayer A '3rd line) is to be deleted and the following is to be inserted:

"for the principal amount of Rs. 59,041.77"

4. A new paragrap






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top