RADHAKRISHNA MENON
RETNAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
VENGANOOR PANCHAYAT – Respondent
1. he plaintiff in a suit for settlement of accounts is the revision petitioner.
2. is application, I. A..3854/87 under Order VI R.17 C. P. C. seeking the following amendments, has been dismissed by the order under challenge:-"Title.
The word "Accounts" to be amended as "damages". 2. Relief:
(A) "A decree allowing the plaintiff to realise the sum of money as found by the court due to the plaintiff from defendant by settling the accounts towards agreement No.29/ 81-82 for the work of seven point programme-construction of burial ground in Kottukulam in Venganoor Panchayat, including all items of works executed, materials supplied for the purpose of work, interest and compensation for damages and refund of security deposit from defendant's assets both movable and immovable is to be amended as:
"A decree allowing the plaintiff to realise Rs. 72,130.77 as per the statement of accounts given below from defendant's assets both movable and immovable".
3. Prayer B.
From the 2nd line portion from "for the money due to the plaintiff from defendant as per Prayer A '3rd line) is to be deleted and the following is to be inserted:
"for the principal amount of Rs. 59,041.77"
4. A new paragrap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.