SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ker) 418

THOMAS
RAMAN NAMBOODIRI – Appellant
Versus
KUNHAYAMATH – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. A. decree passed by the Court of Small Causes was pending execution. An application was filed for transferring the decree to the Munsiff's Court so as to enable the decree holder to proceed against the immovable properties of the judgment-debtor. That application was dismissed. Consequently, the execution petition was also dismissed. The order is challenged in this Civil Revision Petition.

2. The decree obtained by the petitioner from the Court of Small Causes was for a sum of less than rupees three hundred with costs and interest. Petitioner made some attempts to execute the decree by proceeding against the judgment-debtor in person as well as his movable properties. Having failed in such attempts, he filed the application for transferring the decree to the Munsiff's Court. It is contented that the transferring court should not have decided the question whether any future application is liable to be dismissed. The further contention is that the execution petition should not have, at any rate, been dismissed since the decree-holder has not exhausted his attempts to execute the decree even in the court before which the execution was pending.

3. I have to decide first wh






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top