1. Petitioner is a Confidential Assistant in the Sub Court, Tirur since 19-6-1974. In this Original Petition, the attack is against Exts. P7, P8 and P10. By Ext. P6 dated 8-2-1988, second respondent transferred the petitioner to Ponnani and posted in his place the third respondent at Tirur. The third respondent approached this Court on the administrative side. Ext. P6 was set aside by Ext. P7 proceedings dated 27-6-1988. - It was observed therein that the request of the petitioner for transfer to Ponnani was rejected by the High Court by order dated 29-10-1987 and so Ext. P6 order passed by the second respondent dated 8-2-1988 was uncalled for and not passed on sufficient grounds to shift the third respondent, who is admittedly senior to the petitioner, from Ponnani to Tirur. Ext. P7 was given effect to by the second respondent, by Ext. P8 dated 1-7-1988. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Ext. P9 before the High Court to review Ext. P7 order. By Ext. P 10 order dated 14-9-1988, the High Court declined to review Ext. P7 order to retransfer the petitioner again to Ponnani. It was held that the matter was considered in detail and there is no sufficient justification to revi