SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 88

B.N.PATNAIK
Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Avarankutty Haji – Respondent


Judgment :-

The additional 4th defendant in O. S. No. 46 of 1995, on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Parappanangadi, has preferred this revision petition against the judgment dated 13.9.1995 in C. M. A. No. 22 of 1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Tirur. By the impugned order, the learned Sub Judge while dismissing the appeal against the order in I. A. No. 660 of 1995 allowed the petition of the appellants/ defendants therein for appointment of a Receiver to conduct the election of the office bearers of the managing committee of the mosque (3rd respondent herein) in the presence of the representative of the Wake Board. The respondents/ plaintiffs agreed to the suggestion of the appellants/ defendants therein and their counsel submitted that he has no objection in disposing of the appeal in terms of the affidavit filed by the 2nd appellant.

2. Respondents 4 & 5 herein instituted O. S. No. 46 of 1995 in the Munsiff s Court, Parappanangadi for issue of a mandatory injunction directing respondents 1 & 2 herein (who were defendants 1 and 2 in the suit) to prepare a list of members of the General Body of the Society, which is respondent No. 3 herein (defendant No. 3 in the suit) and to h




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top