SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 2

K.T.THOMAS, S.SANKARASUBBAN
Reshma Finance Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Forest Officer – Respondent


Judgment :-

Thomas, ag. C. J.

Can a financier (who advanced loan on the security of a motor vehicle) claim aright to be heard in confiscation proceedings involving the motor vehicle under S.61A of the Kerala Forest Act (for short the act)? This question is raised in this writ appeal by the appellant which is a financing company.. As the learned single judge answered the question in the negative, this appeal has been filed under S.5 of the

Kerala High Court Act.

2. Facts necessary for this appeal are the following: One lorry (Ashok Leyland) was seized by some forest officials on 16.5.1995 alleging that the vehicle was used for committing a forest offence by transporting forest produces. The lorry was produced before the Divisional Forest Officer (first respondent), who was the authorised officer as per S.61A of the Act. First respondent issued notice to the registered owner of the vehicle (Second respondent) to show cause why confiscation proceed! ngs should not be initiated in the matter. The present appellant on coming to know of the proceedings, approached the Divisional Forest Officer and requested him to hear him also before any final order is passed. But first respondent did not












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top