SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 15

P.V.NARAYANAN NAMBIAR
P. K. Koya Moideen – Appellant
Versus
G. Hariharan – Respondent


Judgment :-

The prayer in the Criminal M.Cs. is to quash C.C. Nos. 971/93, 974/93 and 207/94 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-IV. Kozhikode. The petitioner in the Criminal M.Cs. is the accused in all the three cases and the respondent is the complainant. Complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act' are filed by the respondent against the petitioner and process was issued to him. The petitioner seeks to quash the complaints on the ground that those are not maintainable as the respondent/complainant is not the payee or holder in due course. According to counsel for the petitioner only the payee or the holder in due course can institute a complaint and as the complainant does not satisfy the definition of either, the complainants filed by him should not have been taken cognizance by the court below.

2. The cheques in question were drawn in favour of R. Ganapathi Iyer, father of the respondent/complainant. The cheques are dated 3-5-1993 and 12-5-1993. Father of the respondent died on 19-5-1993. It is stated in the complaints that Ganapathi lyer executed a will and the complainant and his brother were made the executors unde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top