SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 237

B.N.PATNAIK, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN
Nandakumar – Appellant
Versus
Arbitrator – Respondent


Judgment :-

Patnaik, J.

The short question that arises for consideration in this original petition is whether the expression "the application shall be accompanied by a list of relevant records on which the dispute is based for deciding the dispute", occurring in Rule 67 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules (for short'Co¬operative rules') casts a mandatory duty on the petitioner to file the documents as per the list along with the petition as held in Gopalakrishnan Panickerv. State of Kerala (1990 (2) KLT 495). The learned single judge while interpreting that provision found that a copy of the order declaring the election was not filed along with the election petition. He held that "this declaration forms the basis of the petition, and R.67(i) requires all annexures to be produced along with the petition. When the very basis of the election petition is not produced, along with it as required, despite the mandate contained in sub-rule (i) of R.67, the petition has to fail for non-compliance with this mandatory requirement".

2. The petitioner, a member of the second respondent co-operative Society, filed a petition under R.67 of the co-operative Rules, challenging the validity of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top