SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 208

C.S.RAJAN, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN
Geevarghese – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment :-

Rajan, J.

The appellant wants to correct his date of birth from 13.7.1943 (29.11.1118 ME) to 19.9.1944 (3.2,1920 ME). The request for correction of the date of birth was rejected by the second respondent by Ext. P6 order dt. 2.5.1994. The appellant filed an appeal against the above order before the first respondent. The above appeal was also rejected by Ext. P8 order dt. 18.5.1995. Aggrieved by Ext. P8 order, the appellant filed O. P. No. 10829 of 1995 before this court. A learned single judge by Ext. P13 judgment dt. 30.11.1995 quashed Ext. P8 order and directed the first respondent to consider the appeal petition submitted by the appellant afresh after taking into consideration the document produced by the appellant. Thereafter the second respondent passed Ext. P15 order dL 9,2.1996 again rejecting the request of the appellant to correct his date of birth. The challenge against Ext. P15 order was not successful before the learned single judge. Hence this appeal.

2. Sri. M. V. Bose, learned counsel for the appellant strenuously argued that Ext. P15 order did not consider any of the documents produced by the appellant as directed in Ext. P13 judgment. The most important d












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top