C.S.RAJAN, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN
Geevarghese – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Rajan, J.
The appellant wants to correct his date of birth from 13.7.1943 (29.11.1118 ME) to 19.9.1944 (3.2,1920 ME). The request for correction of the date of birth was rejected by the second respondent by Ext. P6 order dt. 2.5.1994. The appellant filed an appeal against the above order before the first respondent. The above appeal was also rejected by Ext. P8 order dt. 18.5.1995. Aggrieved by Ext. P8 order, the appellant filed O. P. No. 10829 of 1995 before this court. A learned single judge by Ext. P13 judgment dt. 30.11.1995 quashed Ext. P8 order and directed the first respondent to consider the appeal petition submitted by the appellant afresh after taking into consideration the document produced by the appellant. Thereafter the second respondent passed Ext. P15 order dL 9,2.1996 again rejecting the request of the appellant to correct his date of birth. The challenge against Ext. P15 order was not successful before the learned single judge. Hence this appeal.
2. Sri. M. V. Bose, learned counsel for the appellant strenuously argued that Ext. P15 order did not consider any of the documents produced by the appellant as directed in Ext. P13 judgment. The most important d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.