SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 218

K.P.DANDAPANI
Hariprasad – Appellant
Versus
S. I. of Police, Tirur – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.P. Dandapani, J.

Two counsel counsel the cause of civil courts in Tirur.

2. They project the helplessness of the Courts against the staging of the Dharna, procession and other modes of agitations in front of the gate of the Court, which also happens to be the open space leading to the offices to the Sub Treasury, Sub Registry and the Sub Jail, apart from the busy Tirur Railway Station. They state that the agitations by different political parties being held in that open space with sound amplifiers, loud speakers and cone mikes and on such occasions no useful work could be done in any of these offices, especially in Courts. Sometimes the nuisance starts from morning and continues till evening with amplified sound running into several decibels, the counsel complains.

3. The petitioners seek the issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents, who are the police officers of Tirur and Malappuram, not to give permission to use sound amplifiers and loud speakers in front of the court premises and also not to erect bamboo poles fitted with sound amplifiers and loud speakers in the Municipal Town Hall.

4. No counter affi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top