Balusubramanyan, J.

In this Revision, the plaintiff questions the order of the Court below holding that the plaintiff has not valued the reliefs in the plaint properly and asking him to value the reliefs on the basis of the amount shown in the demand notice in respect of which he was seeking relief in the suit.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit praying for a declaration that the Revenue Recovery proceedings No. R. R.1/91/PGT imitated by defendants 1 to 4 is illegal, erroneous and unsustainable besides being malafide and for a further declaration that the plaintiff has no liability to pay any amount which has accrued after 8.4.1987 and that the liability of the plaintiff is only to pay the amounts due to the second defendant upto 8.4.1987. The plaintiff also sought a consequential decree for permanent injunction restraining defendants 1 to 4 from proceeding further with the revenue recovery proceedings referred to above as against the plaintiff. He valued the suit for the purpose of declaration and consequential injunction at Rs. 1,000/-and paid a Court fee under S.25(d)(ii) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act and paid a court fee of Rs. 20. It may be noticed th