SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 417

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Sukhalal – Appellant
Versus
Munsiff, Cherthalla – Respondent


Judgment :-

Abdul Gafoor, J.

This is a petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India. Challenge is against Ext. P8 judgment, Ext. P9 decree and Ext. P10 order directing delivery. Ext. P8 is a judgment in a counter claim filed by the 3rd respondent in a suit filed by the petitioner as O.S.807/91 in the Munsiff Court, Cherthala. The petitioner remained ex-parte whereas the defendant filed affidavit in support of the counter claim. Accordingly, a judgment was rendered in the counter claim allowing the 3rd respondent to recover item No. 2 shed scheduled in the counter claim and Rs. 850/- with mesne profit at the rate of Rs. 300/- per annum from the date of counter claim till realisation with 6% interest. A decree was drawn in terms of the judgment as per Ext. P9. In execution thereof, as per Ext. P10 order, the petitioner was directed to deliver the said shed to the 3rd respondent over-ruling the objection that he had filed an application to set aside the ex-parte decree.

2. The petitioner is a tenant under the 3rd respondent company who had initiated proceedings to evict the petitioner as RCP 29/87 in the Rent Control Court, Cherthala, Alleging that the 3rd respondent is making ha















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top