SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 360

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, B.N.PATNAIK
Rohini Panicker – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Sales Tax Officer – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.

Petitioner in this Original Petition is the partner of a firm which conducts business of Video library in Trivandrum. The nature of the business conducted by the petitioner is that members of the library would be enlisted on payment of a fee of Rs. 50/- with an additional security amount of Rs. 300/-. The members of the library are eligible to borrow cassettes from the library on a lending fee of Rs. 10/- per cassette. The member can retain the cassette for 2 days and if he keeps it for more than 2 days, he has to pay extra fee. The member is also liable to make good any damage or loss caused to the cassette.

2. The 1 st respondent issued notice to the petitioner stating that the firm would come within the definition of "dealer" given in S.2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (for short "the act) and was liable to be assessed under the Act. Petitioner filed objection to the notice. His objections were overruled and Exts. P5 and P6 assessment orders were passed for the year 1984-85 and 1985-86. Petitioner challenged Exts. P5 and P6 orders. Petitioner alleges that he is not a dealer under the Act nor the transaction of lending cassettes to























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top