Patnaik, J.

Both the appeals arise out of the same judgment in O.P.No. 2984 of 1988. They were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Respondent No. 4 in the Original Petition is the appellant in W.A.No. 377 of 1990 and respondents, 1, 2,3 and 6 in the Original Petition are the appellants in W.A.Nb.400 of 1990.

2. Appellants in both the cases have challenged the finding in the Original Petition by which Ext. P15 notification dated 22-3-1988 under S.4 read with S.17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 has been quashed.

3. The case of the petitioner in the Original Petition, who is respondent No. I in both the appeals, in brief is as follows:

Petitioner purchased a piece of paddy land in R.S. No. 38/1 of Kodiyeri Village, in 1978. She reclaimed the land and started the construction of residential buildings. Sree Jagannath Temple, which was established by Sree Narayana Guru in 1906, is situated at a distance of about a kilometer away from the petitioner's property. The above temple is managed by the 4th respondent and the 5th respondent is the President of Sree Jnanodaya Yogam. The petitioner in the O.P. on the one side and the 4th respondent and th