SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 3

M.M.PAREED PILLAY, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, P.SHANMUGAM
Oommen Panicker – Appellant
Versus
Muthoot Mini Chit Fund – Respondent


Judgment :-

Pareed Pillay, Ag. CJ.

Defendants are the appellants. Plaintiff filed the suit 1br realisation of the amount due to the firm Muthoottu Mini Chilly Fund from the defendants (appellants) towards defaulted subscriptions in four chitties conducted by its Bangalore Branch Office in Karnataka State. Overruling the various contentions raised by the defendants, the suit was decreed for Rs. 3,93,000/- with interest at 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 3,10,000/- from the dale of suit till realisation and costs from them.

2. Plaintiff is a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act. It has its branch office at Bangalore. Chitties are conducted by its Bangalore branch office. First defendant was a subscriber in four chitties conducted by the said branch office. Defendants I to 3 had jointly executed promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff-firm on 6-9-1979 for Rs. 70,000/- and on 12-4-1980 for Rs. 92,500/-. As defendants despite repeated demands and registered notice did not care to close the transaction, the suit was filed.

3. Defendants 1 to 3 in their joint written statement contended inter alia that the entire transaction being illegal as it has vi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top