SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 32

M.M.PAREED PILLAY, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, P.SHANMUGAM
Aji – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Pareed Pillay, AG. CJ.

Appellants in W.A. 345 of 1992 challenges the judgment in O.P. 6781 of 1991. They are third parties. W.A. 672 of 1992 is Hired by the petitioner in the O.P. W.A. 664 of 1993 is filed by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Alappuzha and W.A. 272 of 1993 is filed by third parties challenging the decision in O.P. 15848 of 1992.

2. The position of the parties as arrayed in O.P. 6781 of 1991 is followed in the discussion hereunder.

3. O.P. 6781 of 1991 was filed by the President of the Alleppey District Cooperative bank Limited, Alappuzha challenging Exts. P-4 and P-5 orders of respondents 1 and 3. As per Ext. P-4 order, first respondent directed the petitioner to keep in abeyance all further proceedings including interview and appointment proposed by the bank till the enquiry on the complaint petition is over and the fact intimated to the bank in writing. Ext. P-5 is a telegraphic communication issued by the third respondent staying appointments.

4. The learned Single Judge did not find any justifiable reason for cancelling the entire process of selection but directed the Joint Registrar to proceed with the inquiry with notice to the petitioner



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top