SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 22

B.N.PATNAIK, K.SREEDHARAN
Ramesan – Appellant
Versus
Thomas – Respondent


Judgment :-

Patnaik, J.

Both the appeals, having arisen out of the same judgment in O.P. No. 6720 of 1990 dated 11-7-1994 were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The petitioner in the O.P. (hereinafter called 'the committee') is the appellant in W. A. No. 1398 of 1994 and the second respondent in the O.P. (hereinafter called 'the aggrieved employee') is the appellant in W.A. No. 1300 of 1994.

2. The Original Petition was filed challenging the order of the appellate authority under S.18(2) of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 (for short, the act) who held that the termination of the services of the aggrieved employee by the committee was without any reasonable cause and was made in violation of the provisions of S.18(1) of the Act. The committee was directed to reinstate the employee in its service as Lift Operator-cum-Watchman with continuity of service and full back wages and in default, to pay the employee Rs. 28,000/- as compensation inclusive of all service benefits and back wages.

3. The facts of the case are as follows:

The petitioner in the O.P. is the Maintenance Committee, Unity Complex, Sree Narayana Park Road, Cannanore.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top