SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 2

M.M.PAREED PILLAY, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, P.SHANMUGAM
Abdul Rehman Asanaru Kunju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

PAREED PILLAY. AC. C.J.

Petitioners in Crl M.C. 357 of 1993 are the accused in S.C. 8 of 1993. That case was instituted upon complaint by the Excise Circle Inspector, Punalur under Section 20, (3)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The allegation against them is that they on. 13-3-1990 at about 11 a.m. have kept 120 gms. of ganja for sale in the shop taken on lease by the second petitioner. The Excise Inspector had earlier filed a complaint before the Magistrate Court on the very allegation. That case was committed to the Sessions Court, Kollam and it was numbered as S.C. 58 of 1991. Charge was framed. It was read over to the petitioners on 2-12-1992. Case was posted for trial on 16-1-1993. On that day the Sessions Court was apprised of the fact that the Excise Inspector who filed the complaint (Annexure A-1) before the Magistrate was not authorised by the Government under Section 36-A (1)(d) of the Act to institute the case. Thereupon, Sessions Judge discharged the petitioners. On the same day Annexure A-4 complaint was filed before the Sessions Judge on the very same facts alleged in Annexure A-1 complaint.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top