SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 49

K.P.BALANARAYANA MARAR
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
Excise Circle Inspector, Parur – Respondent


Judgment :-

Revision is directed against the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge, Paravur in Crl. A. No. 157 of 1990. The appeal was presented against the conviction and sentence entered by J.F.C.M., Paravur against revision petitioner in C.C. No. 277 of 1988. P.W. 3, the preventive officer attached to the Excise Circle Office, Paravur and P.W. 2, another preventive officer while they were in the course of patrol duty on 9-9-1988 in Kottuvally Village, saw the accused walking along a footpath holding a plastic can. She tried to run away from the place. But she was detained by the officers and the can was checked. The can was found to contain a liquid which on smelling and tasting was ascertained to be contraband arrack. The can was seized and a mahazar was prepared which was attested by P.W. 1. After enquiry, complaint was filed before court under S. 50 of the Kerala Abkari Act alleging commission of offence under S. 55(a) of the Act. Out of the liquid contained in the can, a portion measuring 180 ml. was taken out and sent to the chemical analyst which on analysis was found to contain 35.85% by volume of ethyl alcohol.

2. The accused pleaded not guilty to the charge. Three witne
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top