SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 241

K.T.THOMAS, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Cheriyakutty Mammi – Appellant
Versus
Ummerkutty – Respondent


Judgment :-

Thomas, J. Appellants are the brother and two sisters of one Khadeesa Umma who died in a motor accident on 5-6-1984. She was married but had no children. Her husband made a claim for compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (for short'Claims Tribunal') While the claim was pending adjudication appellants got themselves impleaded in the claim proceedings as respondents. Claims Tribunal passed an award in the said proceedings against the driver and owner of the motor vehicle which was involved in the accident and mulcted the insurance company with liability under the award. Claims Tribunal, however, apportioned the awarded sum (Rs. 86,000/-) in the ratio of 2:1 and allotted the larger portion to the husband and the smaller portion to the siblings of the deceased (appellants). This appeal is in challenge of the ratio adopted for such apportionment.

2. Appellants contend now that under Mohammedan Law the husband of a Muslim lady (who died childless) would be entitled only to one half share of the estate of the deceased and the other half would go to her siblings and hence the Claims Tribunal should have allotted one half of the awarded amount, to the appellants





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top