Judges : K.SREEDHARAN
M.V.Mathai - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No. 1673 of 1994
Decided On : 08/23/1995
Advocates Appeared :
M.R. Rajendran Nair For Petitioner Govt. Pleader (P.K. Behanan) For Respondents
Government Law Officer - Termination of Service - Kerala Government Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978 - Rule 17, Rule 32, Rule 35 - The court held that the termination of the petitioner's service as Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor was illegal and against the Rules, and quashed the order. The court also directed the Law Secretary to accept the petitioner's resignation from the post.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was appointed as Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor for a period of 3 years. The government terminated his services invoking Rule 17 of the Kerala Government Law Officers Rules. The petitioner questioned the validity of the order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination of the petitioner's service was illegal and against the Rules, and quashed the order. The court also directed the Law Secretary to accept the petitioner's resignation from the post.
Issues: The main issue was the validity of the order terminating the petitioner's services as Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the termination of a Government Law Officer's service must comply with the provisions of the Rules, including giving one month's notice or payment of one month's salary before termination. The court also emphasized that the payment of any salary due to a Government Law Officer should precede the termination of service.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order terminating the petitioner's service and directed the Law Secretary to accept the petitioner's resignation from the post of Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor.
Petitioner was appointed as Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor at Ernakulam for a period of 3 years as per G.O.(MS) No. 158/92/ Law dated 1-6-1992. While he was working as such, as per the provisions contained in the Kerala Government Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978 thereinafter referred to as 'the rules'), Government issued Ext. P2, G.O.(MS) No. 148/94/Law dated 27-5-1994 terminating his services invoking R.17 of the Rules. Petitioner questions the validity of that order. For a proper understanding of the effect of order dated 27-5-1994,1 read its relevant portion:
"Now the Government are pleased to terminate the service of Sri. M.V. Mathai, Additional Govt. Pleader & Additional Public Prosecutor, Ernakulam with immediate effect under R.17 of the Kerala Government Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978.
Sri. M.V. Mathai shall be paid Rs.270/- (Rupees two hundred and seventy only) towards salary in lieu of one month's notice.
The District Collector, Ernakulam will take necessary steps to draw and disburse the amount of Rs. 270/-(Rupees two hundred and seventy only) to Sri M.V. Mathai. The expenditure on tin's account shall be met from the concerned head of account".
2. Rule 17 of the Rules authorises Government to terminate appointment of any Government Law Officer other than Special Government Pleader or Special Public Prosecutor at any time before the expiry of the term of his appointment without assigning any reason therefore. But this Rule has got a proviso. It reads:
"Provided that before such termination he shall be given one month's notice or shall be paid one month's salary in lieu of such notice".
From this proviso, it is clear that before terminating the service of a Government Law Officer, Government should give one month's notice to the said Law Officer or he should be paid one month's salary in lieu of such notice. This means that one month's prior notice before termination or payment of one month's salary before termination of the service is mandatory. Either the notice or payment of salary for one month should precede the actual termination of the appointment of any Government Law Officer. If the Government Law Officer is not having a settled monthly salary, such Government Law Officer's appointment tan be terminated only after giving one month's notice.
3. Rule 32 of the Rules deals with remuneration of Government Law Officers at District Court, Additional District Court and Sub Court Centres. They are being paid fees in accordance with the work turned out by them. They are not being paid any fixed salary. Only restriction on the payment is that contained in R.36 of the Rules. As per that Rule, the total amount of fees payable to a Government Law Officer at a District Court, Additional District or Sub Court Centre for a period of one year shall not exceed Rs. 22,500/-. Thus, it is seen that a Government Law Officer at a District Court, Additional District Court or Sub Court Centre is getting fee depending on the work turned out by him. They are not being paid monthly salary.
4. Rule 35 of the Rules provides for payment of retainer fee. As per this Rule, a sum of Rs. 270/- per mensem is paid to the District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor for conducting cases. An Additional District Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor at District Court Centres and Sub Court Centres is not entitled to this retainer fee either. So, it can be taken that an Additional District Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor is to get remuneration in terms with R.32 of the Rules. In the instant case, while issuing order terminating the service of the petitioner, who was Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor, Government directed payment of Rs. 270/- towards salary in lieu of one month's notice. This direction, made in the order, can be taken only as a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.