SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 163

M.M.PAREED PILLAY, P.A.MOHAMMAD, P.SHANMUGAM
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Chandralekha – Respondent


Judgment :-

Pareed Pillay, C.J.

The Forest Tribunal, Palakkad allowed O. A.Nos. 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 of 1982 holding that the respondents could not establish that the lands scheduled in the Original Applications form part of private forests coming within the purview of Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and assignment) Act, 1971 (Act 26 of 1971). The appeal by the State and Custodian of Vested Forests is against the common order- of the Forest Tribunal in the aforesaid original applications which were filed under S.8 of the Act. Altogether 37.81 acres of land has been declared as not vested forests whereby allowing the original applications. Contention of the appellants (respondents in the original applications) is that the properties scheduled in the original applications are private forests to which the provisions of the Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 applied immediately prior to the commencement of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and assignment) Act, and as such the applicants cannot claim exemption from the vesting under the Act.

2. The question that has been referred to this court is whether it is for the State to prove that a particular land is vested forest




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top