M.M.PAREED PILLAY, P.A.MOHAMMAD, P.SHANMUGAM
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Chandralekha – Respondent
Pareed Pillay, C.J.
The Forest Tribunal, Palakkad allowed O. A.Nos. 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 of 1982 holding that the respondents could not establish that the lands scheduled in the Original Applications form part of private forests coming within the purview of Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and assignment) Act, 1971 (Act 26 of 1971). The appeal by the State and Custodian of Vested Forests is against the common order- of the Forest Tribunal in the aforesaid original applications which were filed under S.8 of the Act. Altogether 37.81 acres of land has been declared as not vested forests whereby allowing the original applications. Contention of the appellants (respondents in the original applications) is that the properties scheduled in the original applications are private forests to which the provisions of the Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 applied immediately prior to the commencement of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and assignment) Act, and as such the applicants cannot claim exemption from the vesting under the Act.
2. The question that has been referred to this court is whether it is for the State to prove that a particular land is vested forest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.