K.NARAYANA KURUP
Markose – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent
Heard learned counsel on both sides.
2. The petitioner along with two others had purchased a plot of land comprised in Sy. Nos. 253/1,513/1 and 513/3 of Ernakulam Village. As per registered partition deed, being document No. 2242/85 of Ernakulam Sub Registry, the said land was partitioned by the petitioner and the other two parties. As per Ext. P1 partition deed the land was divided into six plots and three of the plots marked in the plan attached to Ext. P1 as A, Al and A2 were allotted to the petitioner. A further partition of the land allotted to the petitioner and the buildings under construction on the said 1 ands was made between the petitioner, his son and daughter by Ext. P2 partition deed dated 7-10-1985. Construction of building was commenced on the said plot by the petitioner, his son Mohan Markose and daughter Maya Markose and by allotting specific extent and portions of lands demarcating the share of each parties, the petitioner, his son and daughter had become absolute and separate owners of the land and buildings therein. After the completion of the construction of building, the Cochin Corporation assessed the building to property tax separately. Ext. P3 i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.