SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 251

P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Jismol Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner was issued with a passport in which her place of birth was shown as Vazhithala. She wanted it to be altered into Thodupuzha. The Passport Authority relying on Ext. P7 and the Note occurring in Clause iv stated that she had to apply along with a court order by a Judicial Magistrate directing the passport office to change the date or place of birth. According to me, the passport authority was perfectly justified in making such a direction.

2. Counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision Ext. P9 by a learned Single Judge which directs the petitioner to produce an affidavit sworn to by her in front of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. It is not clear from the said judgment whether that case related to an alteration of date of birth. Whatever it be, on the scheme of the relevant rule followed by the passport authority, with respect, I am inclined to differ from the judgment arrived by learned Single Judge in that behalf. But learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is not necessary for this court to decide that question, for, the petitioner will be satisfied with a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Thodupuzha to consider the application of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top