Judges : K.SREEDHARAN
Mehaboob Razool - Appellant
Versus
Public Service Commission - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No. 1419 of 1994
Decided On : 10/05/1995
Advocates Appeared :
M. C. Sen For Petitioner M. K. Damodaran, P.C. Sasidharan & C. vathsalan For Respondents
Qualifications - Pharmacists Grade 11 - The court held that the relevant date for ascertaining the qualification is the date of application, and the candidate must possess the required qualification on that date. The court relied on Rule 19 of the General Conditions, which stated that qualifications prescribed for a post shall be one acquired by the candidate before the date of application. Therefore, the petitioner's name was rightfully removed from the ranked list as he did not possess the required qualification on the date of his application.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Pharmacists Grade 11, and although he obtained registration with the Kerala State Pharmacy Council after the last date for receipt of applications, he was included in the ranked list. However, his name was later removed from the list as he did not possess the required qualification on the date of his application.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not possess the required qualification on the date of his application, as per Rule 19 of the General Conditions. Therefore, the action of the Public Service Commission in removing the petitioner's name from the ranked list was upheld, and the original petition was dismissed.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's name was rightfully removed from the ranked list due to not possessing the required qualification on the date of his application.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 19 of the General Conditions, which stated that qualifications prescribed for a post shall be one acquired by the candidate before the date of application. The relevant date for ascertaining the qualification was deemed to be the date of application.
Final Decision: The original petition was dismissed, and the court upheld the action of the Public Service Commission in removing the petitioner's name from the ranked list.
Public Service Commission invited applications for the post of Pharmacists Grade 11 as per notification dated 27-12-1988. The qualifications required for the post were (1) pass in S.S.L.C or its equivalent examination(2) Diploma in Pharmacy and (3) Registration with Kerala State Pharmacy Council. Last date for receipt of applications for the post was 8.2.1989. Petitioner put in his application for the post on 6.2.1989. Me was allowed to take written test, which was held on 7.9.1991. On the basis of the marks obtained by him, he was included in the short list published on 4.1.1993. He was called for interview on 10.5.1993. In the ranked list prepared thereafter, he was included as Rank No. 7. The ranked list came into existence on 9.6.93. On 6.9.93, Ext. P1 show cause notice was issued to him requiring his explanation as to why his name should not be deleted from the ranked list as he did not possess the required qualification viz. registration with Kerala State Pharmacy Council, on the date of his application. He filed Ext. P2 reply, where it was averred that he applied for registration from the Kerala State Pharmacy Council on 3.2.89 and did get registration on 8.2.89, the last date fixed for receipt of applications. But this explanation was not found acceptable to the Public Service Commission. So his name was deleted from the ranked list.
2. According to learned counsel representing the petitioner last date fixed for receipt of applications was 8.2.89. On that day petitioner had obtained registration with the Kerala State Pharmacy Council. So, petitioner had all the requisite qualifications on the last day fixed for receipt of applications. Further depending on his qualifications, he was allowed to take written test and was interviewed. Basing on his performance, he was ranked No. 7 in the ranked list, which was published on 9.6.93. Thereafter, it was
unjust on the part of the Public Service Commission to remove his name from the ranked list on the ground that he was not having requisite qualification on the date of application.
3. Learned Counsel representing the petitioner placed before me the decisions of the Supreme Court in Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi vs. University of Rajasthan & others OT 1993 (1) S.C.220) and Dr. M V. Nair v. Union of India and other (JT 1993(1) SC.225) and contended for the position that the crucial date for finding whether a candidate was having requisite qualification for a post is as on the last date for receipt of application with reference to which the requisite qualifications should be judged, the only certain date for scruting of the qualifications will be the last date for making the applications. In the above mentioned cases, their Lordship took the view that in the absence of a fixed date, indicated in the advertisement inviting applications. According to their Lordships suitability and eligibility has to be considered with reference to the last day for receiving applications, unless the notification calling for applications itself specifies such a date. In other words, if the notifications do not specify any particular date with reference to which qualification is fixed, the last date for the receipt of application should be taken as the relevant date for finding whether the applicant has got the requisite qualification as per the notification or not. In the instant case, notification fixed 8.2.89 as the last date for receipt of application can that date be considered as the date with reference to which qualification of the candidate is to be assessed?
4. Notification inviting applications for the post of Pharmacist was subject to the general conditions fixed in Part 11 of the notification. Part II contains the relevant rules governing the issue. Rule 19, inter alia stated that qualifications prescribed for a post shall be one acquired by the candidate before the date of application. It means the relevant date with reference to which the qualification is to be ascertained is the date
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.