Judges : K.SREEDHARAN
Muhammed - Appellant
Versus
Parukutty Amma - Respondent
Case No : A.S. No.145 of 1986 & Cross Objection
Decided On : 01/13/1994
Advocates Appeared :
K. Surendra Mohan For Appellants in A.S.145/86 & A.S.525/90 C.K. Aravindaksha Menon, T.B. Thankappan & A. Balagopalan For Appellant in A.S.148/86 C.K. Sivasankara Panicker (Sr. Advocate), K.S. Radhakrishnan, S. Venkatarajan & S. Shy am For Respondents
Joint Accounts - Dispute over ownership of deposits - O.S.441/82 and O.S.613/82 - [State of Maharashtra v. Pollonji Darabshaw Daruwalla, AIR 1988 SC 88], [Padmanabhan Bhavani v. Govindan Bliargavi, 1974 KLT 822], [SarbanDem v. Usiloai Devi, AIR 1984 SC 346], [Narayani Amma v. SaraswathyAamm, 1989 (1) KLT 450]
Fact of the Case:
Dispute over ownership of deposits in joint accounts after the death of the account holder, P.N. Parameswaran Pillai, who died intestate. Plaintiffs, his widow and children, sought a decree declaring their title to the deposits and an injunction restraining defendants 4 and 5 from withdrawing any amount from the joint accounts.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the deposits in joint accounts belonged to the deceased and that the plaintiffs were the sole legal heirs entitled to the amounts. The court dismissed the appeals and allowed the cross-objection filed by the plaintiffs, modifying the decree to grant the plaintiffs the right to recover the amounts from the banks.
Issues: Dispute over ownership of deposits in joint accounts, entitlement of legal heirs to the amounts, and the rights of joint account holders and survivors.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied legal principles from various cases to determine the ownership of deposits in joint accounts, emphasizing the terms of the agreement between joint depositors and the absence of proof of intention to make the survivor the owner. The court held that the legal heirs were entitled to the amounts and that the survivor would be accountable to the heirs in the absence of proof of the deceased's intention to make the survivor the owner.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeals, allowed the cross-objection filed by the plaintiffs, and modified the decree to grant the plaintiffs the right to recover the amounts from the banks.
These appeals arise out of O.S.441/82 and O.S.613/82 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ernakulam. These suits were jointly tried any were disposed of by a common judgment. Therefore I consider if advantageous to dispose of these appeals by a common judgment. A.S.145/86 and As. 148/86 arise out of the suit O.S.441/82. They are filed by the 5th defendant and 4th defendant respectively. The 51h defendant in O.S.441/82 was the plaintiff in O.S.613/82. He challenges the dismissal of his suit in A.S.525/ 90.
2. The short facts necessary for the disposal of those appeals are as follows:- Plaintiffs in O.S.441/82 are the widow and children of late Sri. P.N. Parameswaran Pillai. He committed suicide on 23-1-81. He had not disposed of the properties held by him and so he died intestate. Plaintiffs are the legal heirs to succeed to the estate left behind. Deceased was having accounts with the Bank, which are impleaded as defendants 1 to 3. The accounts and the deposits in the Bank were started by Parameswaran Pillai with his funds but had got defendants 4 and 5 included and accounts made operative by "former or survivor" or "either or survivor". It is the plaintiffs' case that defendants 4 and 5 had no manner of right over the amounts covered by those accounts even though they were second named parties to those accounts and fixed deposits. On these averments plaintiffs have prayed for a decree declaring their title to the amounts in deposit with the Banks and for a prohibitory injunction restraining defendants 4 and 5 from withdrawing any amount lying in deposit in the joint names of Parameswaran Pillai and defendants 4 and 5.
3. First defendant, Bank, filed a written statement contending that plaintiffs must prove that they are the exclusive legal heirs of deceased Parameswaran Pillai. According to Bank, Fixed Deposit No. 2808/109 dated 18-1-78 for an amount of Rs. 17,000/- stands in the names of deceased and 4th defendant to be operated by the former and balance payable to survivor. So also is Savings Bank Deposit No. 149/3350 in which a sum of Rs. 13.17 is the balance. Fixed Deposit No. 2808/107 dated 16-1-1978 for a sum of Rs. 14,000/- stands in the name of the deceased and 5th defendant to be operated by either or survivor and balance payable to survivor. Another Savings Bank account No. 2862 which was started on 18-7-1977 in the names of the deceased and 5th defendant to be operated by either or survivor has a balance of Rs. 542.64. It is further averred therein that the first two accounts i.e. fixed deposit for Rs. 17,000/- and SB account No. 149/3350 were in the names of late P.N. Parameswaran Pillai and Sri. V.G. Narayanan Nair initially with the clause 'former or survivor'. On 22-1-1989, the deceased instructed the Bank in writing to change the name of V.G. Narayanan Nair to V.N. Padmanabhan Nair. Accordingly, the 4th defendant's name was included as the second person in the account.
4. Second defendant, the Canara Bank, Kothamangalam Branch, in its written statement averred that deceased Parameswaran Pillai had the following accounts with the Bank. S.B.Account No. 4891 having a balance of Rs. 494.91 is in the names of Parameswaran Pillai and P.O. Gopalan Nair to be operated by former or survivor. In the joint names of these two, another S.B. account No. 4355 was operated and it has a balance of Rs. 309.66. Rupess 6,000/- has been deposited in Fixed Deposit No. 104/78 in the joint names of P.N. Parameswaran Pillai and Poor Home Society, West Hill, Kozhikode. The amount due on shah Fixed Deposit is to be paid to the Poor Home Society. Another sura of Rs. 8,000/- is covered by Fixed Deposit No. 1/78 in the joint names of Parameswaran Pillai and P.G. Gopalan Nair to be operated by former or survivor. Yet another deposit of Rs. 9000/- covered by Fixed Deposit No. 50/80 is in the joint names of Sri. Parameswaran Pillai and Sri. V.N. Padmanabhan Nair, the 4th defendant in the suit. That account is to be operated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.