SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ker) 327

K.T.THOMAS, P.A.MOHAMMAD
M. Abubacker Kunju – Appellant
Versus
R. Thulasidas – Respondent


Judgment :-

THOMAS, J.

A futile endeavour is being attempted to make a new jurisdiction. A learned single Judge of this court passed an order in exercise of the inherent powers of the High Court as envisaged in S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code'). One of the parties thereto who is not satisfied with the order, now seeks to file an appeal in challenge of the order. His contention is that inherent power has been invoked in the exercise of High Court's original jurisdiction and hence an appeal can be maintained under S. 5(1) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958.

2. But the Registry of this court put up a query to the appellant to clarify whether such an appeal would lie. Counsel answered to it saying that "jurisdiction of the High Court under S. 482 of the Code is equivalent to the jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, which is not appellant or revisional jurisdiction, but original jurisdiction and hence an appeal will lie". He therefore, prayed for sending up the matter to the Division Bench for consideration of the question. Accordingly the Registry has sent it up.

3. Learned counsel repeated his contention during arguments. Till now the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top