Balanarayana Marar, J.

Revision is directed against the judgment of Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode in R.C.A. 129 of 1990. That was an appeal against the order of Rent Control Court, Kozhikode-1 in I.A.4010/89 in R.C.P.158 of 1987. The second appellant before the Rent Control Appellate Authority is the revision petitioner.

2. The rent control petition was filed by respondents 1 to 11 against revision petitioner and respondents 12 and 13 for eviction on the ground of bonafide need for own occupation. Alleging that the tenant has failed to pay the admitted arrears the landlord moved the Rent Control Court by la. 4010/89 for an order under S.12(3) of the Rent Control Act. After hearing both sides the Rent Control Court by order dated 20-1-1990 directed the respondents in the Rent Control Petition to pay or deposit the entire arrears of rent till date as claimed in the petition on or before 20-2-1990 or to show cause why all further proceedings shall not be stopped and respondents directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building. That order was challenged before the Appellate Authority. By order dated 31-5-1990 the Appellate Authorit