SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ker) 182

K.T.THOMAS, V.V.KAMAT, K.NARAYANA KURUP
Moidoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Thomas, J.

In these connected cases, the validity of certain provisions of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (for short'the Act') and the particular Rule framed under the Act has been challenged by different persons who have undertaken contract work in different areas. As per the impugned provisions sales tax has been levied on the sale of goods involved in what is called "works contract", S.2(viii), S.2(xxi) read with Explanation 3(A), S.2(xxvii) read with Explanation 1(A), S.2(xxvi), S.2(xxv) and S.5(1)(iii) of the Act and Rule 8(4) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules (for short'the rules') are the provisions principally assailed herein. When these cases came up before a Division Bench on reference, it was felt that the issues involved are of far-reaching importance and of substantial revenue and hence, the Division Bench referred these batch of cases to a Full Bench. It was thus that the cases have reached us.

2., The impugned provisions as such were brought into the Act by means of

y amendments carried out from 1-4-1984 to 1-7-1987. We make it clear mat the challenge is confined to these provisions which remained on the statute book as on 1-7-1987. We state this














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top