SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ker) 340

Judges : K.T.THOMAS,P.A.MOHAMMED
Ponnappan - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Case No : Crl.A.143 of 1991
Decided On : 11/15/1994
Advocates Appeared :
M.N. Sukumaran (Sr. Advocate) & B. Raman Pillai For Appellant Addl. Director General of Prosecution (K.C. Peter) For Respondent

Accomplice evidence can be relied upon if corroborated, and the identity of the deceased is not essential in a murder trial if there is unimpeachable evidence of the accused's involvement in the murder.

Headnote:

murder - criminal conspiracy - destruction of evidence - Indian Penal Code, Section 302 - Evidence Act, Section 32, Section 6

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a diabolic plot where the accused conspired to fake a motor accident and death to claim a hefty insurance amount. The accused murdered an innocent person, Chacko, to stage the accident and elude suspicion.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the first and second accused guilty of murder, criminal conspiracy, and destruction of evidence based on the evidence provided by the approver and corroborative material. The court also concluded that the deceased was not the intended victim, Sukumarakurup.

Issues: The main issues were the identification of the deceased, the admissibility of accomplice evidence, and the sufficiency of evidence to establish the guilt of the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that accomplice evidence can be acted upon if it appears to be true and is corroborated in material particulars. The court also ruled that in a murder trial, it is not essential to establish the identity of the deceased if there is unimpeachable evidence of the accused's involvement in the murder.

Final Decision: The court confirmed the conviction and sentence of the first and second accused and dismissed the appeals.

Judgment :-

Thomas, J.

One Sukumarakurup was believed to be the victim of a murder and the body was found in flames in a motor car inferno. But later it was revealed that the body was no of Sukumarakurup, but of one Chacko and that Sukumarakurup played the role ai kingpin in a diabolic plot to make a facade that he was killed. It was done with the rapacious motive of inveigling a whopping sum covered by an insurance police subscribed to by himself at Abudabi. This is the nub of the prosecution story.

2. Though the police nabbed all others believed to have been involved in the conspiracy, the one who eluded from the dragnet of the police is Sukumarakurup himself. So the case was charge sheeted without him as the accused. One of the culprits was transposed as an approver and was examined as an eye witness. Sukumarakurup brother-in-law (wife's sister's husband) and his driver were arrayed as the first ai second accused respectively. Sukumarakurup's wife and her sister were arraigned third and fourth accused respectively. Learned Sessions Judge convicted the first and second accused of murder/criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence, but the remaining accused were acquitted. These appeals have been filed by the convicted persons.

3. Synopsis of the prosecution story, having the silhouette of a crime thriller screen play, is the following: Sukumarakurup belonged to Cheriyanadu (near Chengannur) and was employed in Abudabi where he was living with his wife. A greedy thought burgeoned in his mind for becoming fabulously rich over night. Pursuant thereto he took a policy of insurance at Abudabi in a total sum of 301616 Dirhams (roughly thirty lakhs rupees ). He decided to make it appear to all concerned that he got involved in a motor accident and died so that the entire insurance amount can be collected by his wife. This nebulous idea became crystallised into an orchestrated scheme in which his brother-in-law (first accused ), his loyal driver (second accused) and an attender in his company at Abudabi (P.W.1) were enlisted as participants. For the successful execution of this scheme a small quantity of 'ether' was procured from the laboratory of Alleppey Medical College.

4. Sukumarakurup and P.W.I landed at Trivandrum during the first week of January, 1984. The four conspirators (Sukumarakurup, first and second accused and P.W. 1) met at'Smitha Bhavan", Cheriyanadu (which is the house of Sukumarakurup's wife) and carefully worked out details regarding implementation of the plot. They fixed 21-1-84 as the D-day for the final operation.

5. On 21-1-84 all the four met together at Kalpakavadi (a tourist hotel on the National Highway located about 20 Kms. south of Alleppey town). Sukumarakurup reached there in his Ambassador car (KLY 5959). Others reached there in the car of the first accused (KLY 7831). They proceeded from there (Sukumarakurup in one car and others in the other car) southwards on the National Highway hoping to come across somebody having resemblance with Sukumarakurup. But even after covering a distance of about 23 Kms (upto a place called Oachira) they could not find any such person. While proceeding back as they reached karuvatta (about 13 Kms from Oachira) deceased Chacko who was waiting for a vehicle to go home, raised his hand as a signal soliciting for a lift in the car. As the conspirators felt that he had resemblance with Sukumarakurup, they gave him a lift in the car KLY 5959.

6. While the vehicles were on the move, first accused offered a drink to the deceased but he declined. First accused persisted in persuading him and after mixing brandy with ether in one glass he caused the victim to drink it. Within a few moments first accused put a towel around his neck and began to strangulate him and then he slouched his head.

7. The vehicles then proceeded to Smitha Bhavan. The victim's body was carried to one of the rooms and his clothes were changed, the shirt and lunki of Sukumarakurup were put on it. They then car































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top