SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 160

JOHN MATHEW, NARAYANA KURUP
Achamma George – Appellant
Versus
Trio Packaging Company – Respondent


Judgment :-

John Mathew, J.

These appeals arise from the execution proceedings in O.S. No. 154/1976 of the Additional Sub Court, N. Parur. The decree was one for money obtained by the State Bank of India, Cochin Branch, which is hereinafter referred to as the decree-holder against Trio Packaging Company, M.G. Road, Ernakulam, which is hereinafter referred to as the 1st judgment-debtor, for realisation of an amount of Rs. 2,41,083.77 and interest thereon.

2. The decree schedule property was sold in execution. The judgment debtor filed E.A. No. 606/88 to set aside the sale. Judgment-debtors 1 and 2 filed E.A. No. 60S/ 88 to set aside the sale. These applications were dismissed by the execution court by separate orders dated 22nd December, 1988. The 9th judgment-debtor has filed C.M.A. No. 8/89 and the judgment-debtors 1 & 2 have filed C.M.A. No. 41/89 against the respective orders dismissing their application to set aside the sale. In both these appeals the auction purchaser is impleaded as a respondent. He is hereinafter referred to as the auction purchaser.

3. The only point to be considered is whether the sale is liable to be set aside.

4. There are 10 judgment-debtors in the decree.































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top