SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 134

PARIPOORNAN, BALANARAYANA MARAR
Rajan Nair – Appellant
Versus
Mohan – Respondent


Judgment :-

Balanarayana Marar, J.

The complainant has filed this petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short, the Act) praying that necessary action may be taken against the respondent for contempt of this court as per the memorandum of charges produced along with the petition. The facts leading to the petition are as follows:

2. Petitioner was employed as a temporary salesman-cum-assistant Accountant in the Cochin Unit of the Indian Naval Canteen Service. His services were terminated with effect from 8-4-1982. The termination was challenged before this court in O.P. 2990/1982. By judgment dt. 30-10-1984 the termination order was quashed and consequential directions were issued by this court. The operative portion of the judgment reads:

"Accordingly I quash Ext.P6 and declare that the petitioner continues in service. I further direct respondents 1 and 2 to treat the petitioner as if he is continuing in service and consequently to give him all the benefits he is entitled to, including pay and allowances".

3. Respondent took up the matter in appeal. A Division Bench of this Court by judgment DT. 18-3-1985 rendered in W.A.58/1985 dismissed the appeal. A special leave petit



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top