SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 94

MANOHARAN
Madhavan – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petition under S.482 Cr. P.C. is to quash the proceedings in C.C. 471 of 1991 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam. Photo copy of the complaint is Annexure A-4.

2. According to the petitioner, the son of the petitioner had business transaction with the 2nd respondent and the 3rd respondent Sub Inspector of Police who is a friend of the 2nd respondent got the son of the petitioner to the police station and made him execute Annexure A-1 receipt under duress purporting to be one for Rs. 5S,200/-. Then the petitioner was taken to the police station by the 3 rd respondent on 17-4-1991 learning that the petitioner had account with the Union Bank of India, South Chittoor, and the 3rd respondent at the behest of the 2nd respondent made the petitioner to sign a blank cheque leaf under threat and coercion. Later the petitioner received Annexure A-2 notice dated 21-6-199t intimating that steps under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the Act') would be taken. On receipt of the said notice, petitioner sent Annexure A-3 reply dated 1-7-1991 to the 2nd respondent which he received on 2-7-1991. As per Annexure A-3 it was intimated that there is no
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top