SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 46

GUTTAL
Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Kottayam Co-op. Urban Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

The Kottayam Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. the respondent No.1 herein is currently under the control of the Administrator, the respondent No.2 to this petition. Elections to the Managing Committee of the respondent No.1 society are scheduled to be held on 7-2-1993. The respondent No.3 to this petition is the Returning Officer. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kottayam is respondent No.4 to this petition.

The petitioner a member seeks a direction to accept the petitioner's nomination as valid.

2. The petitioner filed his nomination before 14-1-1993 which was the time stipulated by the Returning Officer. On 15-1-1993 at the time of scrutiny it was found that the petitioner as a guarantor had not discharged the debt of the principal debtor. Meanwhile on 14-1-1993 the petitioner claims to have paid off the debt of Rs.465/- owed by his principal debt or to the respondent No.1 Bank. A copy of the receipt (Ext.P1 to the petition) was produced before the Returning Officer on 15-1-1993. The Returning Officer carne to the conclusion that the petitioner was a defaulter and therefore ineligible under S.28(t) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules and rejected the nom










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top