T.L.VISWANATHA IYER
Kopparakandathil Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
The Dist. Collector, Kannur – Respondent
Petitioners did not comply with the terms of the bail bond executed to ensure the attendance of the accused and in respect of which they stood sureties. The accused did not appear on a date fixed for hearing, whereupon the court forfeited the bail bond and directed the petitioners to pay a penalty of Rs. 1500/-. It would appear that the case was subsequently withdrawn; but proceedings for enforcement of the forfeited bail bond and payment of the fine of Rupees 1500/- were pursued under the Revenue Recovery Act (R.R. Act). The notices, Exts. P2 to P6 were issued to the petitioners. They are challenged on the ground that the amount cannot be recovered under the provisions of the R.R. Act.
2. Section 446 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lays down the procedure for forfeiture of bail bonds and for imposition of penalty. It further provides that the amount can be recovered as if it were a fine imposed by the Court. Section 421 lays down the modes of recovery of fine. To recover the amount, the court may issue a warrant to the District Collector authorising him to realise the amount as an arrear of land revenue from the movable or immovable property or both of the defa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.