SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 390

P.A.MOHAMMAD, L.MANOHARAN
P. K. Mohammed Rasheed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

L. MANOHARAN, J.

This matter has come up before us as per order of reference by a learned single Judge (Thomas, J.).

2. This Cri.M.C. is by the accused in S.T. No. 305 of 1993 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur to quash Annexure D complaint filed by the 2nd respondent under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as amended by Act 66 of 1988 (for short 'the Act'). Petitioner alleges that the said complaint does not contain allegation regarding the ingredients constituting the offence punishable under section 138 of the Act. According to the petitioner Annexure D complaint since does not contain an allegation to the effect that the cheque issued by the petitioner was returned by the bank unpaid as the amount of money standing to the credit of the petitioner is insufficient to honour the cheque, the complaint cannot be entertained and no cognizance could have been taken on the basis of the said complaint. Petitioner issued a cheque for an amount of Rs. 30,750/- in favour of the second respondent; but by Annexure A letter petitioner informed the Manager, South Indian Bank Ltd., Eriyad Branch that the payment as per cheque has to be stopped f












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top