SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 347

M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Nesamony – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

A new ration shop was sanctioned at Kallimoodu in Ward No.VI of Vellarada Panchayat. 4th respondent by Ext.P-1 notification dated 14-8-1985 invited applications for appointment as authorised retail distributor for the newly sanctioned shop. Petitioner, 5th respondent and several others applied for appointment as authorised retail distributor pursuant to Ext.P-1.4th respondent considered the applications and by order dated 16-5-1986 (Ext.P-2) appointed the 5th respondent as the authorised retail distributor. The appeal filed by the petitioner against Ext.P-2 order before the 3rd respondent was rejected on the ground that the petitioner is a resident of Ottasekharamangalam Panchayat, whereas the 5th respondent is a resident of Vellarada Panchayat. Ext.P-3 is the order dated 5-12-1987 passed by the 3rd respondent. However, in Ext.P-3, it was made clear that the petitioner is better qualified to be appointed as authorised retail distributor than the 5th respondent. Revisions filed by the petitioner against Ext.P-3 order before the 2nd respondent and the 1st respondent were dismissed. Exts. P-4 and P-5 are the orders. In this Original Petition petitioner challenges Exts. P-2





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top