M.M.PAREED PILLAY
Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
Asst. Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
Petitioner's father is a licenced gold dealer and the petitioner is conducting the business. On 10-11-1974 his shop was inspected by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Trichur and party and seized certain items of primary gold and gold ornaments and they were confiscated under the Gold Control Act,1968. Petitioner's reply to the show cause was not accepted and Ext.P-1 order was passed by the first respondent confiscating the seized items of gold under S.71(1) of the Act with an option to the petitioner to redeem the gold ornaments on payment of fine of Rs.5,000/- within three months from the date of receipt of the order.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the third respondent did not take any steps to dispose of the appeal filed by him for about 8 years, that he was informed as per Ext. P-2 of the posting of the appeal on 26-6-1986 and that his counsel appeared before the third respondent on hearing dale and that it was submitted that the petitioner be allowed to redeem the gold ornaments on payment of fine of Rs.5,000/-. Third respondent passed Ext.P6 order rejecting the appeal and confirming Ext.P-1. Petitioner contends that he is ready to pay the fine amount of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.