SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 158

K.JOHN MATHEW, K.NARAYANA KURUP
Mohammed Kunju Isha Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Elayakunju Shahul Hameed – Respondent


Judgment :-

John Mathew, J.

Plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was for recovery of possession with arrears of rent. According to the plaintiffs plaint A schedule building belonging to them was leased out to the defendant on 8-10-1982 on a monthly rent of Rs.150/- as per Ext.Al agreement. Plaint B schedule movables belong to the defendant. As per Ext.Al agreement plaintiffs agreed to purchase B schedule movables for a consideration of Rs.9,610/-. On Ext.Al date the defendant paid Rs.9,000/- to the plaintiffs as security for the rent arrangement. After the period of lease the plaintiffs were ready and willing to repay the advance and purchase B schedule movables on Baying the sale consideration. The defendant did not agree to execute the sale deed in respect of plaint B schedule movables. He was also not willing to surrender vacant possession of A schedule building. Rent was paid only upto 12-9-1985. Due to the damages caused by the defendant to plaint A schedule building the plaintiffs have sustained a loss of Rs.2,000/-. - Plaintiffs caused to send Ext.A2 lawyer's notice dated 8-10-1985 terminating the tenancy. Subsequently the suit was filed.

2. Defendant contended that his fat

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top