SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 239

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, K.SREEDHARAN
Sainalabdeen Musliar – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sreedharan, J.

Writ petitioner in O.P.9732/1992 challenges the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 23-3-1993 dismissing the said Original Petition.

2. The short facts necessary for the disposal of this writ appeal are as follows.- Kallada Bricks and Tile Works was owned by the father of the third respondent. On his death, the business devolved on third respondent, his mother and brothers and sisters. Third respondent was the Managing Partner of the factory. 4th respondent was an employee in that factory. He was dismissed from service. That gave rise to Industrial Dispute 31/1988. Labour Court, Kollam directed the management to reinstate the worker with all back arrears and other attendant service benefits by its award dated 17-4-1989. As the workman was not paid his wages in terms of the award, he approached the Labour Court, Kollam by moving Claim Petition 85/1989 Binder S.33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". That Court, by order dated 18-9-1991, fixed the amount payable to the workman at Rs.52,388/-.

3. After the award in I.D. 31/1988, writ petitioner purchased the factory and its site under three documents executed by third












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top