SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 187

K.NARAYANA KURUP, K.JOHN MATHEW
Anthappan – Appellant
Versus
Fr. Paschal – Respondent


Judgment :-

John Mathew, J.

The respondents before the Rent Control Court are the revision petitioners. The respondents herein who are the landlord and his brother, who is the Power-of-Attorney holder of the landlord, filed :the rent control petition for eviction of the tenants under Ss.11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The: petition schedule building originally belonged to the landlord's brother, Emmanual, and his wife, Thresia, The building was leased out by the original owners through their power-of-attorney to the tenants on a monthly rent of Rs.55/- on 1-5-1956 which was later enhanced to Rs. 75/- per month. Emmanual and his wife Thresia gifted the petition schedule building and the property to the present landlord on 16-2-1977. The assignment was duly intimated to the tenants. Subsequently after issuing a notice dated 11-9-1978 terminating the tenancy, the petition for eviction was. filed. According to the landlord he has no other building. He intends to stay in Trivandrum and hence he bona fide requires the building for his residence along with his' brother (the 2nd petitioner before the Rent Control Co









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top