K.NARAYANA KURUP, K.JOHN MATHEW
Anthappan – Appellant
Versus
Fr. Paschal – Respondent
John Mathew, J.
The respondents before the Rent Control Court are the revision petitioners. The respondents herein who are the landlord and his brother, who is the Power-of-Attorney holder of the landlord, filed :the rent control petition for eviction of the tenants under Ss.11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The: petition schedule building originally belonged to the landlord's brother, Emmanual, and his wife, Thresia, The building was leased out by the original owners through their power-of-attorney to the tenants on a monthly rent of Rs.55/- on 1-5-1956 which was later enhanced to Rs. 75/- per month. Emmanual and his wife Thresia gifted the petition schedule building and the property to the present landlord on 16-2-1977. The assignment was duly intimated to the tenants. Subsequently after issuing a notice dated 11-9-1978 terminating the tenancy, the petition for eviction was. filed. According to the landlord he has no other building. He intends to stay in Trivandrum and hence he bona fide requires the building for his residence along with his' brother (the 2nd petitioner before the Rent Control Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.