SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 201

K.T.THOMAS
Alex – Appellant
Versus
Vijayan – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioner is indicted for the offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the N.I. act )- Petitioner describes himself as Managing Partner of a firm called "M/ s. Southern Transporting Company". The case against the petitioner was instituted on a complaint filed by the respondent. This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed by the petitioner under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint.

2. Averments in the complaint show that petitioner issued a cheque for Rs. 13,000/- - drawn on South Indian Bank, Kalamassery, for discharge of a liability; the cheque was dishonoured by the drawee bank and the petitioner failed to pay the amount inspite of notice served on him. Learned Magistrate before whom the complaint was filed took cognizance of the offence and issued process to the petitioner.

3. Petitioner seeks to have the complaint quashed mainly on the following contentions: The cheque was issued by the firm and hence the offence was committed by the firm and not the petitioner. Prosecution is not maintainable as the firm is not made an accused in the complaint even if petitioner was in charge of the business of the fi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top