P.A.MOHAMMAD
Beepathumma – Appellant
Versus
Thankamma – Respondent
These two revision petitions are arising from suit O.S.No.105/86 on the file of the Munsiff's Court. Parappanangadi. It is a suit for partition. Petitioners in these revisions are not parties to the suit. They filed two separate interlocutory applications, one for impleadment and other for the issue of a commission. Both these petitions were dismissed by the court below as per the common order dated 1-9-1987, which is challenged in these petitions. C.R.P.No.1711/87 is against the order in I.A. 2248/86 and C.R.P. 2345/87 is against the order in I.A.I415/87. The plaintiff is figured as first respondent in both the revisions and the defendants 1 to 8 as respondents 2 to 9.
2. The facts of the case can be summarised thus: One of the items of properties comprised in R.S.451/2 is the plaint schedule property which is sought to be partitioned in O.S.105/86. It was originally belonged to Guruvayoor Devaswom in jenmom rights. It was held by one Unichira Amma on kanam rights as per kanam chit dated 31-1-1927. Guruvayoor Devaswom filed O.S.No. 80/81 in the Munsiff's Court, Parappanangadi against the legal heirs of Unichira Amma in realisation of the arrears of rent due under the ka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.