SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 169

P.A.MOHAMMAD
Beepathumma – Appellant
Versus
Thankamma – Respondent


Judgment :-

These two revision petitions are arising from suit O.S.No.105/86 on the file of the Munsiff's Court. Parappanangadi. It is a suit for partition. Petitioners in these revisions are not parties to the suit. They filed two separate interlocutory applications, one for impleadment and other for the issue of a commission. Both these petitions were dismissed by the court below as per the common order dated 1-9-1987, which is challenged in these petitions. C.R.P.No.1711/87 is against the order in I.A. 2248/86 and C.R.P. 2345/87 is against the order in I.A.I415/87. The plaintiff is figured as first respondent in both the revisions and the defendants 1 to 8 as respondents 2 to 9.

2. The facts of the case can be summarised thus: One of the items of properties comprised in R.S.451/2 is the plaint schedule property which is sought to be partitioned in O.S.105/86. It was originally belonged to Guruvayoor Devaswom in jenmom rights. It was held by one Unichira Amma on kanam rights as per kanam chit dated 31-1-1927. Guruvayoor Devaswom filed O.S.No. 80/81 in the Munsiff's Court, Parappanangadi against the legal heirs of Unichira Amma in realisation of the arrears of rent due under the ka























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top