SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 36

P.KRISHNA MOORTHY, M.JAGANNADHA RAO, K.SREEDHARAN
Vimala Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment :-

Krishnamoorthy, J.

This Review Petition is filed by respondents 1 to 3 in the Writ Appeal who are petitioners in O.P.No.6720 of 1986 against which the Writ Appeal was filed.

2. The Writ Appeal was heard along with certain other Writ Appeals and was disposed of by a common judgment dated 4th December, 1992. The Writ Appeals were filed by the State.

3. It is alleged in the Review Petition that the review petitioners had engaged Mr.K.S. Rajamony, Senior Counsel as their advocate who was appointed as a Member of the Kerala Public Men Corruption Commission and on his accepting the assignment the petitioners engaged the present counsel Mr. James Vincent who filed Vakalath in the case on 23-3-1992. He had also filed C.M.P.No.2294 on 23-3-1992 for an early posting of the Writ Appeal. But when the Writ Appeals were posted for hearing before the Full Bench in November, 1992 the name of counsel was omitted to be noted in the cause list and the names of the parties alone were shown. Accordingly counsel had no notice and the Writ Appeal happened to be disposed of without hearing counsel for the review petitioners. Even though in the judgment Sri.K.P.Satheesan is shown as having represe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top