SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 426

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, K.SREEDHARAN
Manager M. M. H. S. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sreedharan, J.

Fifth respondent in the Original Petition, who is the Manager of M.M. High School and U.P. School, New Mahe, is the appellant. Learned Single Judge directed the Deputy Director of Education to compute the monetary loss sustained by the writ petitioner on account of the failure of the Manager in not giving her appointment and to realise it from the Manager under the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act for payment to the writ petitioner. Appellant questions the correctness of the said direction.

2. Short facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows: - Writ petitioner had approved service in the school under the management of the appellant as a Lower Grade Hindi Teacher in the U.P. section of the school from 1-2-1973 to 23-4-1973 and from 29-1-1985 to 9-3-1985. She had also another term as H.S.A. (Hindi) between 17-2-1983 and 19-4-1983. On the retirement of a Lower Grade Hindi Teacher in the U.P. section on 31-3-1990, a vacancy arose in the U.P. section with effect from 1-6-1990 in the cadre of Lower Grade Hindi Teacher. Writ petitioner made representations to the Manager for getting appointment against the said vacancy. She also approache










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top