Balanarayana Marar, J.

The appeal is directed against the judgment in O.P.804/1989. Petitioner is the appellant.

2. Petitioner was a Shroff/Godown-keeper attached to the Trivandrum Branch of 1st respondent, the Indian Overseas Bank. For certain misconduct he was charged sheeted by the bank and proceeded against in terms of bipartite settlement between the 1st respondent and its workmen represented by All India Overseas Bank Employees' Union. Petitioner was kept under suspension and an enquiry was conducted. The enquiry officer found petitioner guilty of the misconduct alleged against him. The disciplinary authority proposed to dismiss him from service and he was asked to show cause against the proposed punishment. After the receipt of his explanation the disciplinary authority imposed punishment of discharge. An appeal was preferred against this order. The appellate authority, the Deputy General Manager, reduced the punishment to one of stoppage of five future increments with cumulative effect. Pursuant to that order petitioner rejoined duty on 11-4-1984. In the meanwhile, the Central Bureau of Investigation had registered a case against the petitioner for offences under