SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 170

Judges : SREEDHARAN
Mathew - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No. 9246 of 1988
Decided On : 06/30/1992
Advocates Appeared :
Josemon K.J. For Petitioners Govt. Pleader (V.K. Mohammed Yousuf) For Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the B.Ed. degree is recognized as a higher training qualification than T.T.C. and is approved by the Government of Kerala, allowing for appointments as L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. in aided schools.

Headnote:

B.Ed Degree - Appointment of L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. - S.10 of the Kerala Education Act - Rules 3A and 4A of Chapter XXXI K.E.R. - B.Ed. degree recognized as a higher training qualification than T.T.C. - Government order staying the operation of appointments of B.Ed. degree holders set aside

Fact of the Case:

The case considered whether a person with a B.Ed Degree can be appointed as L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. in an aided school, in light of the qualifications prescribed by the Kerala Education Act and the Rules in Chapter XXXI of the K.E.R.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the B.Ed. degree is recognized as a higher training qualification than T.T.C. and is approved by the Government of Kerala. The government order staying the operation of appointments of B.Ed. degree holders was set aside as it was found to be contrary to the statutory Rules.

Issues: The main issue was whether a person with a B.Ed Degree can be appointed as L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. in an aided school, and whether the government order staying the operation of such appointments was valid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of S.10 of the Kerala Education Act, Rules 3A and 4A of Chapter XXXI K.E.R., and the recognition of B.Ed. degree as a higher training qualification approved by the Government of Kerala.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the government order staying the operation of appointments of B.Ed. degree holders was set aside.

Judgment :-

The short question that arises for consideration in this original petition is whether a person with B.Ed Degree cans be appointed as L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. in an aided school.

2. S.10 of the Kerala Education Act states that the Government shall prescribe qualifications to be possessed by persons for appointment as teachers in Government and Private Schools. In exercise of this power, Government framed Rules in Chapter XXXI of the K.E.R. prescribing qualifications of Private School teachers. Rule 3 of Chapter XXXI deals with qualifications of teachers in Upper Primary Schools. Sub rule (t) of that Rule deal with Upper Primary School Assistants. The minimum qualification prescribed for Upper Primary School Assistant is a pass in S.S.L.C. Examination conducted by the Commissioner for Government Examinations, Kerala or its equivalent and T.T.C. Examination conducted by the Commissioner for Government Examinations, Kerala. Rule 3Aof Chapter XXXI stales that notwithstanding anything contained in Sub Rule (1) of Rule 3, the Educational Officer shall be competent to approve the appointments of candidates possessing higher qualification provided they have any of the training qualifications approved by the Government of Kerala.

3. Sub Rule (1) of Rule 4 of Chapter XXXI prescribes the minimum qualification for the post of Lower Primary School Assistant as a pass in S.S.L.C. Examination conducted by the Commissioner for Government Examinations, Kerala or its equivalent and a pass in T.T.C. Examination conducted by the Commissioner for Government Examinations, Kerala. Rule 4A states that notwithstanding arty thing con tined in Sub Rule (t) of rule 4the Educational Officer shall be competent to approve appointment of candidates possessing higher qualification provided they have any of the training qualifications approved by the Government of Kerala.

4. In view of the above provisions should T.T.C. be a compulsory qualification to be possessed by one for getting the post of L.P.S. A. or U.P.S. A? Sub Rules (1) of Rule 3 and Rule 4 while prescribing the minimum qualification states that T.T.C. is the minimum training qualification required for L. P.S.A. and U.P.S.A. Rules 3A and 4A allows the Educational Officer to approve the appointments of candidates possessing higher qualifications. The candidates possessing higher qualifications should have any of the training qualifications approved by the Government of Kerala. The training qualification made mention of in R.3A and 4A can be training qualification other than T.T.C. So, a person having a training qualification other than T.T.C. can be appointed as an L.P.S.A./U.P.S.A. provided that training qualification is one approved by the Government of Kerala. It is conceded before me that B. Ed, degree is a training qualification. It is also agreed that the B. Ed, training qualification is approved by the Government of Kerala. That training qualification namely B. Ed., it is agreed, is a higher training qualification than T.T.C. So, a person who is having the higher training qualification of B. Ed, is entitled to be appointed as L.P.S.A. or U.P.S.A. in view of the specific provision contained in Rules 3A and 4A of Chapter XXXI, K.E.R.

5. Government issued Ext.Pl order G.O.MS. 65/88/G.Edn. dated 5-3-88 stating that persons possessing the basic qualification in teaching i.e. T.T.C. alone will be considered for appointment as Lower Primary School Assistants and Upper Primary School Assistants in aided schools even if they are having B. Ed, qualification. This order was issued because Educational Officers were approving appointments of B. Ed, degree holders as Lower Primary School Assistants and Upper Primary School Assistants. Educational Officers were approving the appointments of B. Ed, holders on the assumption that it is a higher qualification to T.T.C. Operation of this order was stayed, by Ext.P2. It is stated that the position prevailing as before the date of Ext.P1G.O. will continue in o


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top