SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 157

JAGANNADHA RAO, SREEDHARAN, KRISHNAMOORTHY
Sebastian – Appellant
Versus
Linet Suba – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sreedharan, J.

This is a reference made by the District Court, Kollam, under S.17 of the Indian Divorce Act, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". Court below, by order dated 4-7-1991, dissolved the marriage between the petitioner/husband and first respondent/ wife. It also directed second respondent, the adulterer, to pay damages to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- to the petitioner.

2. Husband moved a petition under Ss.10 and 34 of the Act, alleging as follows:-Marriage of the petitioner with the first respondent was solemnised on 9th July, 1981 at the Immaculate Conception Church, Pullichira. At the time of the marriage, petitioner was employed in Abudhabi. After 21 days of cohabitation, he returned to Abudhabi on 28th July, 1981. He returned on leave on 5th October, 1982 and stayed with the first respondent till 16th November, 1983. A male child was born to the wedlock on 25th July, 1983. Later he stayed with the first respondent from 28th March, 1984 to 2nd May, 1984. Thereafter, he could return to India only in September, 1989. On 29-3-1990, Petitioner's cousin brother informed him over the phone that first respondent and the child are missing. Father of the first responden




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top