SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 116

K.A.NAYAR
Kerala State Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Rajamoni – Respondent


Judgment :-

Even though the pleadings are elaborate the facts to be considered fall in a narrow compass. The dispute, stated to be arising between the petitioners and second respondent, was referred for adjudication by Ext.P2. It says that Government is of opinion that the industrial dispute exists between the second respondent and the petitioners, as well as the workmen of the second respondent including Sri. K. Rajamoni, the first respondent, in respect of the matters mentioned in the Annexure and the same is referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode. The Industrial Tribunal was directed to pass award within a period of three months. The dispute referred is: "Eligibility of the workmen, employed for the construction of Padinjarathara Dam for Kuttiadi Augmentation Scheme, for the wage rates and other benefits fixed in the minimum wage notifications issued by the State Government for the workers doing similar works in the employments coming under Item No.3.7 and B part I of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act, and (2) Conversion of the advance paid to the above workers as payable wages."

2. Notice relating to reference was received by the petitioners on 18-2-













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top