SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ker) 150

PAREED PILLAY
Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
Jayasooryan – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioners are the accused in C.C.318 of 1991 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thalassery. First respondent filed the complaint under Ss.500 and 501 read with S.34 of the I.P.C. alleging that the news, item published in the Deshabhimani Daily in its Kozhikode Edition dated 26-5-1991 with respect to the cremation of Rajiv Gandhi, President of the Congress (I) is false,

mischievous and politically motivated. The report slated about the insufficiency of sandal wood pieces for the cremation. The first respondent alleged that on account of the publication of the said news report the members of the Indian National Congress (1) have been lowered down in public estimation and that this is per se defamatory.

2. Section 199 Cr.P.C. lays down an exception to the general rule that a complaint can be filed by any body whether aggrieved or not and modifies that rule by permitting only an aggrieved person to make a complaint [See G. Narasimhan v. T.V. Chokkappa (AIR 1972 SC 2609)]. With regard to offences under Ss.499 to 502 coming within Chap. XXI of the I.P.C. an aggrieved person alone can file the complaint. Thus, from S.199 (1) it







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top